Psychological Review of Visual Communication on the Instagram Platform: Analysis of Support for SDGs-5 Empowerment for Gender Equality

Authors

  • Rafinita Aditia Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Bengkulu University, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Lisa Adhrianti Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Bengkulu University, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yusra Hamed Al-Nahari Faculty of Creative Industries, City University Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v5i2.1235

Keywords:

Gender Equality, Instagram, Psychological, SDGs, Visual Communication

Abstract

This research conducts a comprehensive exploration of the psychological dimensions of visual communication on the Instagram platform, specifically analyzing its support for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a focus on SDGs 5 for gender equality and empowerment. SDGs 5 is critical in promoting global gender equality and contributing to sustainable development. This research investigates the diverse roles of Instagram as a medium for disseminating information, education, advocacy, inspiration and collaboration regarding gender issues and women's rights. This research uses a qualitative approach using literature study methods to comprehensively investigate the psychological dimensions of visual communication on the Instagram platform, especially in support of SDGs 5 for empowering gender equality. These findings underscore Instagram's important contribution, revealing its effectiveness in shaping perceptions, attitudes and behavior regarding SDGs5 goal. Despite its positive impact, ethical considerations and challenges related to credibility, privacy and security require careful attention. This research provides valuable insights for stakeholders, offering a psychological review of visual communication on Instagram and improving strategies for achieving SDGs 5 empowerment and gender equality in a sustainable manner.

References

Al-Rawi, A. (2019). News values on Instagram: A comparative study of international news organizations. Media and Communication. 7(2), 77–88

Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?. Social Media + Society. 3(1), 1–13

Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 965–974). ACM

Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge

Belingheri P, Chiarello F, Fronzetti Colladon A, Rovelli P (2021) Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0256474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474

Caleo, S., & Heilman, M. E. (2019). What could go wrong? Some unintended consequences of gender bias interventions. Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000063

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications

Derous, E., & Pepermans, R. (2023). Gender discrimination in hiring: Intersectional effects with ethnicity and cognitive job demands. Scientific Psychology, 7(3), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000061

Dhir, A., Pallesen, S., Torsheim, T., & Andreassen, C. S. (2016). Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours? Computers in Human Behavior. 63, 549–555

Dijck, J. van. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. UK: Oxford University Press

Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. UK: Pew Research Center

Fakih, M. (2001). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

French, D., & Kotzé, L. J. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of the implementation of the sustainable development goals and international law. UK: Cambridge University Press

Giles, H., & Harwood, J. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of intergroup communication. UK: Oxford University Press

Gilrane, V. L., Wessel, J. L., Cheung, H. K., & King, E. B. (2019). The consequences of making the right impressions for STEM women: Meta-stereotypes, impression management, and supervisor ratings. Scientific Psychology, 7, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000065

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday

Greene, J. O., & Burleson, B. R. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Hargie, O. (2016). The handbook of communication skills (4th ed.). London: Routledge

Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2020). Mapping scholarly publications related to the sustainable development goals: A data-driven approach. Quantitative Science Studies. 1(3), 1092–1117

Hebl, M., & King, E. B. (2019). Gender equality in the workplace: An introduction. Scientific Psychology. 7(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000071

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice. 2(1), 47–62

Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117

Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 595–598). AAAI Press

Ikouta Mazza, P. (2020). Concepts of sustainable development; a literature review and a systematic framework for connecting the role of education with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education. 8(8), 66–77

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons. 53(1), 59–68

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons. 54(3), 241–251

Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications

Kostelnick, C., & Hassett, M. (2003). Shaping information: The rhetoric of visual conventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London : Routledge

Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P. G., & Wall, T. (Eds.). (2019). Good health and well-being: Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals. Switzerland: Springer

Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 18(9), 552–556

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). IL: Waveland Press

Lomborg, S., & Bechmann, A. (2014). Using APIs for data collection on social media. The Information Society. 30(4), 256–265

Madera, J. M., Ng, L., Sundermann, J. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2019). Top management gender diversity and organizational attraction: When and why it matters. Scientific Psychology, 7, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000060

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson

Michelmore, K., & Sassler, S. (2016). Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter? The Russel Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Vol.2 No.4, 194-215

Miller, K. (2014). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes (7th ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning

Nussbaum, J. F. (Ed.). (2018). Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. UK: Oxford University Press

Patel, H. R., & Lee, S. M. (2017). Social media use and its impact on communication satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 20(5), 301-312

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. UK: Oxford University Press

Puspitawati, H. (2013). Konsep, Teori dan Analisis Gender. Bogor: Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Institut Pertanian Bogor

Rettberg, J. W. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. UK: Palgrave Macmillan

Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable Development Report 2021. UK: Cambridge University Press

Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior. 58, 89–97

Stjernfelt, F., & Sonesson, G. (Eds.). (2017). Signs and meaning: 5 questions. Denmark: Automatic Press

Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Cognitive Science. 3(3), 499–535

Turner, G. F., & Clark, E. M. (2016). Gender differences in communication styles: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 142(6), 589-625.

UNICEF. (2018). Harnessing the power of data for girls: Taking stock and looking ahead to 2030.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. From https://SDGs.un.org/goals

Veirman, M. D., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising. 36(5), 798–828

Young, C., Fa-Kaji, N. M., Cheng, S., Beier, M. E., & Hebl, M. R. (2019). Answering prospective student e-mails: The effect of student gender, individuation, and goals. Scientific Psychology. 7, 12–21

Ware, C. (2008). Visual thinking for design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann

Watzlawick, P., Beavin Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company

World Economic Forum. (2018). The Global Gender Gap Report 2018. http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2018/

Downloads

Published

2024-06-03

How to Cite

Aditia, R., Adhrianti, L., & Al-Nahari, Y. H. (2024). Psychological Review of Visual Communication on the Instagram Platform: Analysis of Support for SDGs-5 Empowerment for Gender Equality. MEDIASI Jurnal Kajian Dan Terapan Media, Bahasa, Komunikasi, 5(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v5i2.1235

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.