Commodification of Women with Disabilities in Pond's Ads Your Face Edition Your Strength

Authors

  • Ria Anggraini Universitas Budi Luhur, Indonesia
  • Denik Iswardani Universitas Budi Luhur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v4i3.795

Keywords:

Commodification, women in advertising, Semiotics, John Fiske

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to interpret the commercialization practices of women with disabilities referred to in advertising, using John Fiske's semiotic approach, namely, the meaning of representation, the meaning of reality and the meaning of ideology in advertising. The commercialization of women in this advertisement can show that femvertising (feminist advertising) does not mean that women are not objectified. Instead of empowering women, the practice of femvertising further marginalizes women in media texts. The author argues that the femvertising strategy is a strategy that is not intended as a women's empowerment by building constructive messages, but only cloaks from capitalism by packaging advertisements using certain appeals to use the product. Thus, the perception of the product leads to purchasing decisions, which ultimately benefit the product.

References

A. Bonardo Marulitua. (2016). Komodifikasi, Disabilitas, dan Televisi. Jurnal Cakrawala, 5(2), 01–02.

Arya, N., Cangara, H., & Unde, A. A. (2013). Komodifikasi Kemiskinan Dalam Televisi Indonesia. KAREBA: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 175–186.

Barry, B. (2015, October 14). Diversity in Fashion Advertising Does Sell. Https://www.businessoffashion.com/Opinions/Marketing-Pr/Op-Ed-Diversity-in-Fashion-Advertising-Does-Sell/.

Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893

CREC, A. S. (2013). Representasi Perempuan Muslim Kontemporer: Identitas Perempuan Muslim pada Iklan Wardah. VISUALITA, 5(1), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.33375/vslt.v5i1.1107

Entwistle, J. (2002). The Aesthetic Economy. Journal of Consumer Culture, 2(3), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/146954050200200302

Fauziah, N., & Puspita, R. (2020). Komodifikasi Perempuan pada Iklan Pond’s Perfecting Cream Edisi WOW! Featuring Maudy Ayunda (2019). Jurnal Kajian Media, 4(2), 01–02. https://doi.org/10.25139/jkm.v4i2.2567

Feldman, J. (2017). Tommy Hilfiger Launches a Line for adults with disabilities. In: HuffPost Canada. Https://Www.Huffpost.Com/Entry/Tommy-Hilfiger-Disabilities_n_59e78bc7e4b08f9f9edc4332.

Fernandez, P. W. (2013). Komodifikasi Perempuan dalam Iklan Televisi. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 8(1), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v8i1.182

Furkan, E. B. F., & Putra, D. K. S. (2017). Disguisting: Kritik Atas Citra Kecantikan Telaah Semiotika John Fiske terhadap Representasi Modern. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(2), 91–94.

Kumalaningtyas, N., & Sadasri, L. M. (2018). Citra Tubuh Positif Perempuan dalam Iklan Video Digital (Studi Femvertising pada Iklan Dove Real Beauty). Diakom: Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi, 1(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v1i2.19

Mayaningrum, H. Q. (2016). Komodifikasi Hijab dalam Iklan Kosmetik Sophie Paris versi “Natural & Halal” di Televisi. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 4(2), 01–02. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v4i2.6227

Mosco, V. (1996). The Political Economy of Communication. Sage Publications.

Nugraheni, Y., & Yuliastuti, M. (2017). Keyakinan dan Kesukaan Ibu Rumah Tangga Surabaya Mengenai Tayangan Iklan Layanan Masyarakat “Ayo Makan Ikan.” Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v11i1.2836

Nurul Akmalia, S. A. (2001). Commodification of Children on Social Media Endorsement (Case Study on @zaskiaadyamecca’s Instagram Account). MEDIASI, 2(2), 122–123.

Simanullang, E. P., & Yesicha, C. (2018). Representasi Poligami Dalam Film Athirah (Studi Analisis Semiotika John Fiske). JOM FISIP Universitas Riau, 5(1), 06–07.

Sugiyanto, D. R. (2015). Komodifikasi Berita Dibalik Ideologi Ekonomi Politik Media (Studi Pada Program ‘Polemik‘ di Radio Sindo Trijaya 104.6 Fm Jakarta). Jurnal Komunikasi Untar, 7(1), 57–69

Suhodo, D. (2016). Think Out of The Box: Proses Kreasi-Kreativitas Industri Periklanan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 24(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.24.2.2016.71-83

Susilo, D. (2017). Etnometodologi sebagai Pendekatan Baru dalam Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 1(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v1i1.66

Thomas, L. (2001). Disability is Not so Beautiful: A Semiotic Analysis of Advertisements for Rehabilitation Goods. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(2), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i2.280

United Nation. (2023). Achieve Gender Equality. https://Sdgs.Un.Org/Goals/Goal5.

Vera, N. (2014). Semiotika dalam Riset Komunikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.

Published

2023-10-04

How to Cite

Anggraini, R., & Iswardani, D. (2023). Commodification of Women with Disabilities in Pond’s Ads Your Face Edition Your Strength. MEDIASI Jurnal Kajian Dan Terapan Media, Bahasa, Komunikasi, 4(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v4i3.795

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check